AirTag is a tracking device developed by Apple, announced on April 20, 2021 during the Spring Loaded event. In the United States, a woman has been charged with murder after finding her boyfriend using an Apple AirTag and knocking him down after seeing him with another woman.
AirTags are accessories that attach to backpacks, luggage and other items. By combining visual, haptic and audio feedback, AirTags aim to make it easier to keep track of the things that matter to you.
“We are excited to be able to bring iPhone users this amazing new opportunity with the launch of AirTag, which uses the vast Find My network to help them track and find important things in their lives,” said Kaiann Drance, vice president of global marketing for iPhone products. Apple during the launch of the device. With its design, unparalleled search experience and built-in privacy and security features, AirTag will provide users with another way to harness the power of the Apple ecosystem and enhance the versatility of the iPhone.
The price for one AirTag is $ 29, and a pack of four AirTags can be purchased for $ 99. Apple’s AirTags use ultra-wideband (ULB) technology and take advantage of the company’s existing network of devices, which work as collective beacons to contact each other to determine the location of your item. AirTag is a super easy way to keep track of your stuff. Attach one to the keys, put the other in the backpack, says Apple.
However, police reports show that women are stalking Apple AirTags. Police records show that, as security experts immediately predicted when the product was launched, this technology was used as a tool to stalk and harass women. In one report, the woman called police because the man who was harassing her intensified her behavior, and she said he put an AirTag in her car. The woman said the same man threatened to turn her life into hell, the report said.
Gaylyn Morris, 26, reunited with her boyfriend Andre Smith, also 26, at Tilly’s Pub in a mall in Indianapolis using a gadget in the early hours of June 3, it is claimed. The witness said Morris approached him in the parking lot and asked if Smith was at the bar, saying he had a GPS tracker showing he was inside, according to a sworn statement by Detective Gregory Shue. Morris, according to the witness, then spotted Smith at the facility.
When officers arrived on the scene, they found Andre Smith under the front of a 2010 dark blue Chevrolet Impale registered to Gaylyn Morris. Jordan Shaffer of IFD 6 witnessed the death of André Smith at 12:56 p.m. Smith dcd 12:56. Police on the spot arrested the driver of the Chevrolet Impale, later identified as Gaylyn Morris. The criminal department was contacted and I responded, along with other inspectors. I intervened. Gaylyn Morris was transported to the IMPD Bureau of Homicide for an interview. says the witness.
The witness entered the bar and saw Morris, Smith and another woman arguing. The witness recorded two recordings of the fight and handed them over to the police. According to another witness, Morris grabbed a bottle of beer and hit Smith’s companion, but Smith intervened. The owner of the bar then asked three people to leave.
According to other witnesses in the affidavit, Morris said he used the Apple AirTag to locate Smith. Morris, according to the sworn statement, then left, got in his car and drove away. When Smith got out, Morris stopped in front of Metro Diner, east of Tilly’s, and rolled down the sidewalk toward Smith, overturning it, it is claimed.
After Morris pulled away from his boyfriend and veered off the curb, according to the sworn statement, one of the witnesses tried to stand in front of the car to protect Smith, but Morris reportedly bypassed the witness and hit him in the left hip. the mirror of his car, then knocked down Smith and dragged him away.
A qualified nurse who tried to intervene was unable to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation because Smith’s body was completely under the car between the front wheels, with the driver’s head behind the front wheel and the front passenger’s feet on the front passenger’s side. statement.
When officers arrived, they found Smith under a 2010 dark blue Chevrolet Impale registered to Morris. He was pronounced dead at 12:56 a.m. on the spot.
When questioned by police, Morris reportedly denied using AirTag to track Smith. Asked whether, in the event of a search warrant, a tracker would be found in Smith’s car, Morris, according to the sworn statement, admitted that Apple placed the wireless tracker in the back seat of Smith’s vehicle, near the cup holder.
A search warrant for Morris ’Chevy Impala resulted in the discovery of the Apple AirTag packaging box. And Smith was carrying an Apple iPhone. In an interview with Indiana, Smith’s aunt, Reneka Day, said: The public should not use these tracking devices. They should not be available to the public. They should only be used by hospitals and the judiciary.
In March, a man was arrested for tracking his girlfriend’s location by putting a stuck Apple Watch in the victim’s vehicle tire and using a tracking app. This news, a priori isolated, continues to raise questions about the dangers associated with geolocation.
Lawrence Welch, 29, is accused of “illegally attaching an electronic device intended to track another person to a motor vehicle.” An affidavit filed in Davidson County, Tennessee, describes the probable cause of his arrest as a violation of state law that prohibits tracking vehicles without consent. And although Apple has specific equipment for this purpose, AirTags, the entity has opted for an Apple brand smartwatch.
Last month, NBC10 Boston reported identifying at least two dozen cases in the Greater Boston area where phone alerts were activated as a result of Apple AirTag tracking. And in eight of those cases, police reports were not published because it was about domestic violence. Apple recently introduced anti-harassment measures for its AirTag tracking devices, as they were abused for covert surveillance.
These measures include alerts that are transmitted via Bluetooth to nearby iPhones and Android phones, so mobile owners are notified that an AirTag is active nearby. Apple Watch, on the other hand, does not broadcast its presence in the same way. Eva Galperin, director of cybersecurity for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), said there was no obvious recommendation for Apple in this situation.
It is easy to find someone who will say that it is bad. It’s easy to find someone who will say that Apple needs to do something. But what Apple should do in this case is not clear to me. “I can only say that this man chose a very expensive tracking device,” she said.
In February, Apple announced it was taking steps to modify its AirTags to make them less useful for harassment and condemned the misuse of its hardware.
Source: State of Indiana
What is your opinion on this topic?
In your opinion, should Apple leave AirTags?
Man arrested, accused of trying to track a woman using an Apple Watch, attached to the tire of his car
Apple’s AirTags have been linked to several cases of harassment and theft, all complaints about a tool developed to help you simplify the geolocation of your business.
Apple announces AirTag, a new $ 29 Tile-like tracking device, but for Tile it’s unfair competition
How did the scooter owner manage to find his stolen car thanks to a hidden Apple AirTag? Apple’s tracking device is already captivating consumers